3 Comments

Recently I discovered a paper written by the CDC itself (which is about as official as it gets):

"During this same time period VAERS averaged around 6,000 foreign source reports annually. Vaccine manufacturers, which accounted for >99% of foreign source reporting, are required by law to submit foreign source adverse event reports that are both serious and unexpected [21], but not other types of foreign source reports. Given the vaccine manufacturer reporting requirements and the minimal amount of direct public reporting, it is not surprising that a relatively high percentage (48%) of foreign source reports are classified as serious. This likely represents selective reporting based on regulatory requirements rather than any substantial differences in safety profiles of foreign vaccines."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26209838/

While every foreign country only reported "serious and unexpected" cases as per the CDC guidelines, I think Austria was an exception. I wrote an article about it:

https://vaccinedatascience.substack.com/p/why-does-austria-have-an-anomalously

But we can just ignore reports from Austria for this particular discussion, and what you have written here will be true for all the rest anyway.

Expand full comment